De Gruyter Open

From December 2015 Agricultura journal will be published in partnership with De Gruyter Open (degruyteropen.com), the world's second largest publisher of Open Access academic content, and part of the De Gruyter group which has over 260 years of publishing history. De Gruyter Open closely cooperates with the majority of abstracting and indexing services, universities and libraries, providing a wide availability of journal's content and increasing its visibility. Agricultura's full-text articles will be found also at the new address on the De Gruyter Open's platform in following weeks.


Publishing support

Publishing of the journal Agricultura is financially supported by Slovenian Research Agency.

Izdajanje revije Agricultura je finančno podprto s strani Javne agencije za raziskovalno dejavnost Republike Slovenije.


Our Profile

The journal AGRICULTURA (A) publishes scientific works from the following fields: animal science, plant production, farm mechanisation, land management, agricultural economics, ecology, biotechnology, microbiology
ISSN 1581-5439

Jernej TURK, Terence V. PRICE and Anton IVANČIČ

pp. 3-8

Agriculture is one of the basic human activities and, as such, is of paramount importance for the survival of the human race. It has played a pivotal role throughout the process of human civilization which had, in part, begun when people commenced to cultivate plants and to breed animals. Past experience suggests that agriculture is definitely not a simple process and should be harmonized with the nature. This paper discusses the ever–present issue whether profit-oriented agriculture is compatible with the prevailing ethical principles and moral standards.
The main purpose of agriculture is to produce food. The increasing global human population, however, requires more efficient and stable agricultural production. Hunger is still a worldwide problem which can be further deteriorated by using agricultural areas for non food production purposes. The reconciliation between agricultural production and moral standards associated with the production of food and its distribution is therefore a necessity.

Key words: modern agriculture, agricultural policy, ethical responsibilities, moral standards


Slovenian:

Etični izzivi v sodobnem, v dobiček usmerjenem kmetijstvu

Kmetijstvo je ena od temeljnih človekovih dejavnosti in je bistvenega pomena za preživetje človeške vrste. Imelo je ključno vlogo v celotnem procesu človeške civilizacije. Nastalo je, ko so ljudje začeli gojiti rastline in oblikovati pasme živali. Pretekle izkušnje kažejo, da kmetijstvo vsekakor ni preprosta dejavnost in jo je treba uskladiti z naravo. Ta dokument obravnava od nekdaj prisotno dilemo, ali je v dobiček usmerjeno kmetijstvo združljivo z obstoječimi etičnimi načeli in moralnimi standardi. Glavni namen kmetijstva je proizvodnja hrane. Globalno naraščanje prebivalstva zahteva učinkovito in stabilno kmetijsko proizvodnjo. Lakota je še vedno svetovni problem in stanje bi se lahko še poslabšalo z uporabo kmetijskih površin za namene, ki niso proizvodnja hrane. Uskladitev med kmetijsko proizvodnjo in moralnimi standardi, ki se nanašajo na proizvodnjo hrane in njeno distribucijo, je vsekakor nujna.

Ključne besede: sodobno kmetijstvo / kmetijska politika / etična odgovornost / moralni standardi


REFERENCES

1. Burkhardt J, Comstock G, Hartel PG, Thompson PB, Chrispeels MJ,Muscoplat CC, Streiffer R. Agricultural ethics. Issue Paper No 29. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) Ames, Iowa, 2005;12 pp.

2. Chrispeels MJ. Biotechnology and the poor. Plant Physiol., 2000;124:3-6.

3. Cuomo C. Science, values, and common ground. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81/11:2904-7.

4. Dorward A. The effects of transaction costs, power and risk on contractual arrangements: a conceptual framework for quantitative analysis. J. Agric. Econ. 2001;52:59-74.

5. European Commission – Directorate General for Agriculture. Newsletter, No.32. Brussels, 2001.

6. Gomiero T, Paoletti MG, Pimentel D. Biofuels: efficiency, ethics, and limits to human appropriation of ecosystem services. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2010;23:403–34.

7. Hobbs JE. Measuring the importance of transaction costs in cattle marketing. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1997;79:1083-95.

8. Ilea RC. Intensive Livestock Farming: Global Trends, Increased environmental concerns, and ethical solutions. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2009:22:153–67

9. Ivančič A, Turk J, Rozman Č, Šiško M. Agriculture in the Slovenian transitional economy: the preservation of genetic diversity of plants and ethical consequences. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2003;16:337-65.

10. James HS Jr. On finding solutions to ethical problems in agriculture. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2003;16:439-57.

11. Larrere R, Larrere C. Should nature be respected? Soc. Scie. Info. 2007; 46/1: 9-34.

12. Martin JF, Roy ED, Diemont SAW, Ferguson BG Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK): Ideas, inspiration, and designs for ecological engineering. Ecol. Engin. 2010;36/7:839-49.

13. North DC. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, 1992.

14. Olper A. Determinants of agricultural protection: the role of democracy and institutional setting. J. Agric. Econ. 2001;52:75-91.

15. Paarlberg R. The ethics of modern agriculture. Society, 2009;46:4-8.

16. Pascalev AK. We and they: Animal welfare in the era of advanced agricultural biotechnology. Livest. Sci. 2006;103:208-20.

17. Primack RB. A primer conservation biology. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates Inc. Publishers, 1995.

18. Rozman Č, Potočnik M, Pažek K, Bore, A, Majkovič D, Bohanec M. A Multi-criteria assessment of tourist farm service quality. Tourism Man. 2009;30:629-37.

19. Schneider M. Man-nature-technology. Philosophical considerations of man-animal relations. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 2001;108/3:84.

20. Sileshi GW, Nyeko P, Nkunika POY, Sekematte BM, Akinnifesi FK, Ajayi OC. Integrating ethno-ecological and scientific knowledge of termites for sustainable termite management and human welfare in Africa. Ecol. Soc. 2009;14/1 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art48/

21. Singh RK, Sureja RK, Amish K. Indigenous knowledge and sustainable agricultural resources management under rainfed agro-ecosystems. Indian J. Trad. Know. 2008;7/4:642-54.

22. Staal S, Delgado C and Nicholson C. Smallholder dairying under transaction costs in East Africa. World Dev. 1997;25:779-94.

23. Swinnen J, De Gorter H, Rausser GC, Banerjee AN. The political economy of public research investment and commodity policy in agriculture: an empirical study. Agric. Econ. 2000;22:111-22.

24. Thompson PB. The agricultural ethics of biofuels: A first look. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2008;21:183-98.

25. Vorstenbosch J. Of firms and farms: Agricultural ethics and the problem of compensation. J. Agric. Environ. Ethic. 2000;12: 81-98.

26. Zajac FJ, Olsen CP. From transaction cost to transaction value analysis: implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. J. Man. Studies. 1993;30:131-45.

logo dg open        cm stacked 064 plain